Jump to content

developer_mh

Administrators
  • Posts

    1,845
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    172

Everything posted by developer_mh

  1. Here's the link: https://downloads.valentin.de/pvsol/setup_pvsolpremium_2019_14.exe Kind regards, Martin
  2. Hi Mads, thank you for your question. Unfortunately we have not yet implemented this feature that we had in the past in the new consumption dialog. We will implement it as soon as possible. Right now the only solution for you would be to define such a load profile in PV*SOL (premium) 2019 and then import it in PV*SOL (premium) 2020. Kind regards, Martin
  3. Dear Ashraf Elawad, thank you for reporting this problem. We are currently analyzing the issue, and we will get back to you as soon as we have an answer. Kind regards, Martin
  4. Hi Ricardo, thank you for the file. I just opened it in PV*SOL premium 2020 R8 and it simulates fine, without crash. Perhaps you can check if you have these options set to "no", this saves some memory in some cases: Kind regards, Martin
  5. Hi Ricardo, yes, we have that on our list, along with other improvements for the usibility of the 3D environment. Kind regards, Martin
  6. Dear Ricardo, sure we can have a look at your file. Could you send it via private message here, please? Kind regards, Martin
  7. Dear Ricardo, I fear that I must agree with Timgreen's comment. This is not possible, I am afraid. Kind regards, Martin
  8. developer_mh

    Jinko Modules

    Dear Rob, thank you for letting us know about the Jinko modules. I will forward this request to our database team at database@valentin-software.com. In general, the manufacturers are responsible for putting their products into our database, so it might help as well if you contact them (we do as well). Kind regards, Martin
  9. Hi Jon, this is exactly the way to go. You can check if the right modules are equipped with power optimizers if you select the corresponding substring in the tree view on the left (my test project differs a bit from yours): Kind regards, Martin
  10. Dear Natheera, the climate data we use in PV*SOL is from Meteonorm, that is correct. The Meteonorm climate data are based on various sources of radiation measurements (ground stations, satellite) , with different time ranges (e.g. 1961 - 1990 or 1991 - 2010 and so on). The availability of climate dataset source varies from location to location. You can find more on that topic here in the manual of Meteonorm in Chapter 3.1: https://meteonorm.com/assets/downloads/mn73_software.pdf This information refers to a another type of product by Meteonorm, historical time series with one hour resolution. These are not climate data files which we normally use for simulation, as they are not representative. Generally it is advised to use the climate datasets with the most recent years that are available, that is correct. The availability of high quality long term measurements however is distributed very unevenly around the globe, however. Hope that helps, kind regards, Martin
  11. Hallo Energieumdenker, ja, da ist was dran, die Rolle der Klimaanlagen wird wohl wichtiger werden. Es ist jedoch nicht ganz trivial, an sinnvolle Lastprofile von Klimaanlagen zu kommen, aber wir arbeiten dran. Beste Grüße, Martin
  12. Dear guest, thank you for reporting the missing module. I will forward this information to my colleagues at database@valentin-software.com. If you find another missing database product in the future, you can contact them directly. Kind regards, Martin
  13. Hi K24, as Vishnu pointed out, the activation of minute values is most of all important if you have sizing factors of above 115 %, or if you have battery systems or electrical appliances that are involved. If your DC/AC ratio is about 1, and you just want to analyse the feed in, you might be well off with hourly values. But I would always recommend to compare the results at least once. Just simulate your PV system with hourly values, save the results somewehre, and then simulate the same system with one-minute values. Then you'll directly see the differences for your specific case. Our recommendation for the diffuse model is Hofmann (disclaimer: that is me), but we don't recommend it just like that, we have scientific evidence that it performs best under nearly all conditions (especially when using one-minute resolution). See more on diffuse irradiation models here: https://help.valentin-software.com/pvsol/2020/calculation/irradiation/diffuse-irradiation/ Kind regards, Martin
  14. Hi Vishnu, thank you for your question! Could you describe a little more in detail how the system is set up, what you expected from simulation, and what came out in reality? When I understand the chart from SolarEdge right, it says that 181.66 kWh were generated by the PV system, and there was a consumption of 489.42 kWh. Nearly all of the produced PV energy (181.58 kWh) was self consumed, and the rest (307.84 kWh) had to be imported. Is that correct? I guess I am lacking information on where exactly the problem is, I am sorry. Kind regards, Martin
  15. Dear Rob, it is true that row-to-row shading is not calculated in the basic PV*SOL version (without premium). Detailed shading analysis is available only in the premium version. I am sorry that this wasn't clear from the beginning. Kind regards, Martin
  16. Hi Ammar, there could be a lot of reasons. Most of the time is has to do with time zones or daylight saving times. Could you provide the data that you imported? Kind regards, Martin
  17. Dear Rob, sorry for the late reply. What I wanted to say is that the feed-in tariff is not the problem here, but the from-grid tariff. The feed-in tariff is for the Netherlands, that is right and correct. The from-grid tariff however is from Germany and that is why the warning message appears. Kind regards, Martin
  18. Hallo Alexander, im Schaltplan werden externe Leistungsoptimierer mit einem kleinen Sternchen gekennzeichnet. Hier sind z.B. 5 Module ohne Optimierer mit zwei Module mit Optimierer und wieder einem Modul ohne Optimierer in Reihe geschaltet Beste Grüße, Martin
  19. Hallo Matthias, ja, da gibt es eine Funktion in der 3D Rendering Engine, die in Abhängigkeit der Anzahl von sichtbaren Objekten die Art der Darstellung anpasst, um die Performance zu erhöhen. Es handelt sich aber um eine rein optische Anpassung, die Simulation oder andere Teile des Programms sind nicht davon betroffen. Beste Grüße, Martin
  20. Dear Waqar Ahmad, the circuit diagram can be accessed at the page "Plans and parts list". You can edit the security devices and cable properties at the page "Cables". Kind regards, Martin
  21. So I will post our private conversation here (in extracts): Rob's reply: My reply: As for the tariff problem: The net metering tariff is for the Netherlands, that is right, but the from-grid tariff (the second one) is for Germany: Hope that helps, kind regards, Martin
  22. Dear Waqar Ahmad, you will have to go into the 3D environment of PV*SOL, and then either imitate a curved building with segments of straight buildings or import a 3D model from Sketchup or similar applications. Refer to these threads as reference: Hope that helps, kind regards, Martin
  23. Hi Rob, I just wrote an answer to your questions in the private message section. If you allow, I'll post it here so that the other users can read it as well. Kind regards, Martin
  24. Hi Rob, here as well, a project file would be handy in order to see what is going on there. Thanks a lot, kind regards, Martin
  25. Hi Rob, could you provide a project file? You can send it via private message here in the forum. This would make an answer easier. Thanks a lot, kind regards, Martin
×
×
  • Create New...