Jump to content
  1. [English] Photovoltaics

    1. 43
      posts
    2. 6.4k
      posts
    3. 11
      posts
  2. [English] Solarthermal / Geothermal

    1. 24
      posts
    2. 87
      posts
    3. 21
      posts
  3. [Deutsch] Photovoltaik

    1. 47
      posts
    2. 3.6k
      posts
    3. 8
      posts
  4. [Deutsch] Solarthermie / Geothermie

    1. 26
      posts
    2. 49
      posts
    3. 39
      posts
  • Member Statistics

    5,709
    Total Members
    841
    Most Online
    truoffgrid
    Newest Member
    truoffgrid
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 15 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good morning,   Now that the first point has been clarified, just yesterday I discovered that “trick” for fixing connections in multiple areas.   Regarding the second point, it's great that connections can be made that way! I'll try it again, making the connection that way and changing the names of the surfaces. I think it will be easier to modify connections by system so that there is not just one and to prevent all connections from being activated at the same time.   I will share the project with you by email. I have not yet completed the connections as I am still defining them to minimise losses due to voltage drops.   Thank you very much for your help!
    • Dear J. Esteban, Thank you for your inquiry. Unfortunately, the cable plan is not available for elevated systems or polystring configurations. Alternatively, you can use the string diagram. However, cable lengths and diameters cannot be calculated automatically here; you must define them under Cables after exiting the 3D visualisation. If you have already created a cable plan and subsequently make changes to the configuration, the cable/string diagram is not always updated. You must then delete the cable plan (press the ‘Delete all cables’ button), switch back to the Module configuration page and then back to the Cable plan page. Everything is then updated and the cables run in accordance with the configuration. For large systems with complex string distribution we recommend that you manually define module areas for each string or MPPT (with the specified string or MPPT number) using the "Define module areas for configuration" function, as also explained here. First delete the existing inverter configuration. In the "Module Configuration" tab, select all modules for one string or MPPT by holding down the CTRL key and select "Add to "Define module areas" dialogue" with the right mouse button. Then click "Define module areas for Configuration". Rename the module areas (right-click --> Rename). Repeat this for all module areas belonging to the same inverter. Then click "configure" and configure inverter 1 (configure all selected Module Areas together and use Polystring Configuration). Repeat these steps for all inverters. The subsystems will then have a fixed inverter assignment. Direction, starting point and course of a string can be defined in the bottom left corner. The module sequence within a string must be changed manually if required. You can also send your project file (*.pvprj) to hotline@valentin-software.com so that we can take a closer look at it.
    • Dear Josua, Thank you for your inquiry. Photo Plan has been revised. First, select a PV module with black cells in PV*SOL, then select the texture with a black backsheet and frame in the lower right corner of Photo Plan.
    • Good morning,   I am having problems connecting modules. I'm designing a 1.42 MWp photovoltaic plant, I am in the connection stage, and I have noticed the following issues:   1.- As you can see in the first image, I have used some surfaces to use panels from other areas in order to fully utilise the inverter's MPPT. Perhaps because it is a large system, the wiring plan options where I can use groupings, cable glands, etc. no longer appear, as shown in the second image. Why is this? I would like to place these items and have a breakdown of how much cable I am estimated to use, as shown in the third image   2.- The next new feature concerns the connection of photovoltaic modules. As you can see in the fourth and fifth image, I have used solar panels on both sides of a building, leaving the connection provided by the programme by default when I have two sides. However, if I try to modify that connection and go to the wiring plan, the programme completely distorts the connection and pretends that it is not using the panels on the other side of the building, as you can see in the sixth and seventh image. So I have made a connection that is not as viable as in the eighth image because of the error that appears, since if I modify the module connections when I use multiple areas, the connection is distorted; even those panels appear without a connection.   I would appreciate any support that would help me resolve these issues.   I look forward to your comments. Thank you.
    • @patrik k  I'm having the same issue. Do you heard anything new from PhotoPlan or this Company?
×
×
  • Create New...