Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I made a simulation of the same building with exactly the same PV-system but for different locations. But in the one case the standby consumption of th einverter is 24 kWh/a and in the second case 26 kWh/a. What could be the reason for this difference? I checked all the input data douple and they are similar in both cases.

Posted

Hello Renan,

the total stand-by consumption also depends on the irradiation/ climate data of the selected location. This means that a site has reached more phases in which the inverter has not reached its minimum feed-in energy from the pV system, so the inverter switches to stand-by mode. (https://help.valentin-software.com/pvsol/2019/databases/components/inverter/#electrical-data

Kind regards,

Marcel

 

 

  • 6 years later...
Posted

Hi,

I have a question regarding how module degradation might affect standby consumption.

I've noticed a discrepancy in the first-year generation figures: the simulation results show 792,161.3 kWh, while the report states 792,333 kWh. Please see attached screenshots.

Could this difference be attributed to standby consumption being 72 kWh instead of the 86 kWh mentioned in the report?

Thank you.

Kind regards,

Felix Galan

image.png.ac138f9ea2d0d771640f48495af0b46c.png

image.png.101c869030476415a1282e0d9b42470a.png

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...