August 15, 20197 yr comment_2861 Hello, because in simulations the value of the "grid feed-in" is lower than what I indicate in "PV energy during observation period", since they are annual value.Ex:grid feed-in: 1670kwh.PV energy during observation period in first year: 1645kwh. Also, where can I find the theoretical (lossless) annual energy value (kwh)? Thanks! Report
August 16, 20197 yr comment_2871 Hi UserPV, could you provide an example project file so that we can take a look at it? Thanks a lot, kind regards, Martin Report
August 23, 20197 yr Author comment_2898 On 8/16/2019 at 5:42 AM, developer_mh said: Hi UserPV, could you provide an example project file so that we can take a look at it? Thanks a lot, kind regards, Martin You can use as an example an example of PVSOL, such as plant P90 in germany. The Grid feed-in is 20,062,175 kWh/year, while in "PV energy during observation period" is 18,926,713 kWh / year for the first year. I did not understand why the difference for more energy injected into the power grid. Report
August 27, 20197 yr comment_2912 Hi UserPV, in the case of the example project "Solar Park Neuhardenberg incl P90", we have module degradation as well as P50/P90 analysis. See these topics for more information: https://help.valentin-software.com/pvsol/2019/pages/financial-analysis/bankability-p50p90/ https://help.valentin-software.com/pvsol/2019/pages/pv-modules/module-degradation/ These two factors effect the amount of energy that is fed into the grid in the first year. If you set the P50/P90 bankability to 50 and the module degradation to 100% (no degradation), then hese two numbers are equal: You can play around with the factors to see how they influence the results. Kind regards and good luck, Martin Report
December 9, 20241 yr comment_18144 I have a similar case in which the annual generation in the results, does not match with the annual generation of year 1. I have set P50 in bankability, for a 25-year observation period, and the following module degradation profile: Year 1: 99% Year 31: 87% The result for year 1 within the observation period is around 0.4% lower than the estimated annual generation. PV Generator Energy: 23,848 kWh/y Energy Year 1: 23.724.5 kWh Which generation is the correct one? Is 23,848 kWh a generation for year 0? Why do I have a result for 26 years when the observation period is 25 years? Thank you Report
December 10, 20241 yr comment_18150 Dear Felix Galan, Thank you for your inquiry. Please send us your project file (*.pvprj) to hotline@valentin-software.com so that we can take a closer look at it. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.