aapn77 Posted March 26, 2019 Report Share Posted March 26, 2019 Hi to everyone, how can be possible simulate an half cut cell modules like trina TSM PE14H ? Thanks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
developer_mh Posted March 26, 2019 Report Share Posted March 26, 2019 Hi Kamal, right now we don't have a distinct simulation model for half cell modules. But as we recognize that these modules are getting more and more popular, we do have this feature already on our list and hope to publish it soon. In the meanwhile you can just enter your own module data as follows: With these data you can simulate the module. The only thing that will not be 100% correct is the behaviour in partly shaded conditions, so simulate with care Kind regards, Martin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radovan Posted November 15, 2020 Report Share Posted November 15, 2020 Hello, is the behavior in partly shaded conditions for half cut panels already implemented in the PVSOL Premium? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
developer_mh Posted November 16, 2020 Report Share Posted November 16, 2020 Hi Radovan, yes, it is. But be sure to check whether the module you are using has the "Half-cell module" option checked: Kind regards, Martin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LynetteOC Posted February 28, 2021 Report Share Posted February 28, 2021 Hi Martin, I am interested in approaches to modelling half cell modules during shading. I am aware from other pvsol literature that once a shade line hits a standard submodule section, it's considered shaded and generates according to the shaded irradiance. For halfcell modules with typically six distinct submodule areas, is the approach to sum the currents of sections with common bypass diodes, and then sum the voltages of the bypass diode sections? I would be grateful if you correct any inaccuracies, and let me know if there is any literature available describing the modelling approach used by pvsol for shaded half cell modules. Kind regards Lynette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
developer_mh Posted March 1, 2021 Report Share Posted March 1, 2021 Hi Lynette, yes, the assumption is correct. On a standard half cell module, we have six sub-module areas, connected over three bypass diodes. So we have a series connection of 3 x (2 areas in parallel on one diode). I am afraid that at the moment I don't have any other literature to point you at, but here is a video where I try to explain the whole thing. It is in German, unfortunately, but with the auto-generated subtitles, you might be able to understand the main points. Here is also a screenshot from the video that explains the shading behavior in comparison to a standard full-cell module: If you have any further questions, or if you need help with the weird auto-translated youtube video, please don't hesitate to ask. Kind regards, Martin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LynetteOC Posted March 11, 2021 Report Share Posted March 11, 2021 Hi Martin, Thanks for the youtube video. I had some fun with the autotranslate. Luckily I have some German from my Irish Abitur exams, though it was over 20 years ago!. I understand that the module is outputting 2/3 rds of its output at 1G, and 1/3 rd at the shaded irradiance. I was expecting the behaviour to be different however, but maybe I am misunderstanding something, as the diode position is not given. Assuming the diodes combine the two parallel strings outlined in the red rectangle in the halfcell module, and the current from each half cell section to be half of the full cell, I don't see the addition of the currents in the simulation for each bypass diode group. I was anticipating that the currents coming from the shaded half cell bypass diode sections, would be greater than the the shaded full cell bypass diode sections, as half of the current is combined with 0.2 of the current in the scenario outlined below, where I = Isc. The full cell would be generating 0.4I. Could you please clarify? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
developer_mh Posted March 12, 2021 Report Share Posted March 12, 2021 Hi Lynette, I am happy that you had your fun with the video, I hope we can provide a video in English language soon Concerning the sumation of the currents: I quickly checked that and I suppose you are right. Next week I will have the time to check that more in detail and discuss the issue with my colleagues. I will get back to you then. Kind regards, Martin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kashaf Posted June 23 Report Share Posted June 23 Hi When creating half cell modules to compare their performance the only difference will be in ticking the half cell box right? I have been doing this and finding that half cut cells have a greater module configuration shading in comparison to a standard cell with the same rating and all other characteristics. Why must this be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
developer_mo Posted July 3 Report Share Posted July 3 Hi Kashaf, thanks for your post. On 6/23/2024 at 4:57 PM, Kashaf said: When creating half cell modules to compare their performance the only difference will be in ticking the half cell box right? Yes, this is correct. On 6/23/2024 at 4:57 PM, Kashaf said: I have been doing this and finding that half cut cells have a greater module configuration shading in comparison to a standard cell with the same rating and all other characteristics. Why must this be? That also seems different to me than expected. Could you share the project file in this thread or send it to me via private message in this forum so I can take a closer look? Kind regards Mikio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.