Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Simulation for CIS, CIGS modules production is significantly worse than for cSi modules. I can't believe that the difference could be so big.

For example: the same horizontal roof without rear ventilation, central Europe

PV*SOL: JA Solar mono cSi = 901 kWh/kWp, Miasole CIS = 829 kWh/kWp = 92% of cSi.

PV Designer Solar Edge: JA Solar mono cSi = 926 kWh/kWp, Miasole CIS = 913 kWh/kWp = 98,5% of cSi.

PV GIS (ERA 5)cSi = 877 kWh/kWp, CIS = 865 kWh/kWp = 98,6% of cSi.

Posted

Hi Jan Mackovic,

additionally to my answer as private message I want to point at the very bad low light performance of the CIS module. We allow manufacturers to put their low light data even in case the performance drops i.e. the values are probably wrong. You could use our PV*SOL model for CIS modules, which is way better than the manufacturers values but still a conservative value which usually slightly underestimates the real performance.

For being able to adapt this you have to copy the module in the database dialogue.

Best regards,
Frederik

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...