Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Greetings, dear team!

Regarding the surface usage factor within the software, can we say that this factor is the same as the ground coverage ratio (GCR)? Because their concept seems to be the same.

Regards

Posted

Hi Amir,

It depends on the definition but I think it can be seen as the same. In our online help (in the section Tracking types) we defined the surface usage factor as following:

Quote

The Surface Usage Factor indicates the distance between the tracked module rows. A surface usage factor of 1 means that the distance from one module row to the next is equal to the width or height of the module. If the surface usage factor is 0, the next row of modules is infinitely far away. A surface usage factor of 0.5 means that the distance is two module lengths or widths.

Please let me also refer to an earlier post with a simple visualisation and calculation description of the Surface Usage Factor by Martin.

Hope that helps to clarify your question.

Kind regards

Mikio

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...